Skip to content

Philip R. Obermarck

Visual Artist

  • Portfolio
    • Sculpture
    • Painting
    • Drawing
    • Digital
  • About the Artist
    • CV
    • Biography
    • Artist Statement
    • Contact Me
  • Blog
  • Finishing time

    This past week the bulk of my time has been spent sanding. Although I am leaving the sculpture textured, I wanted to smooth it out a bit before I finished. Today I applied the first coat of stain (dried pig’s blood mixed with water) and next week, I will begin applying the oil finish.

    I have been in contact with the University’s Estates department to discuss the hanging requirements, and once the paperwork has been passed throughout the  programme director’s office, they will be installing an anchor point in the ceiling. I am ordering up some natural hemp rope, and will use it to bind his ankles together and hang him from the ceiling.

    The paintings are coming along and I am working on the best way to display them. I am considering mounting them to slightly smaller pieces of hardboard and hanging them using french cleats. This will place them off the wall by about .75 inches, effectively creating an unframed shadowbox effect.

    As part of the publications team, the group coordinating the catalogue, I am working with Jake, Emma, Rachel and Stephen to decide on the look and feel of the degree show publications. The show will be called Masters of the Multiverse and in a meeting with the PR group, we chose to make our logo inspired by the 80’s movie version of the Masters of the Universe. I created the logo in Illustrator Friday afternoon.

    Masters of the Multiverse

    Finally, I am also working on a book that will hopefully be available at the show. I plan on using the images I’ve made to illustrate the Norse myth the Mead of Poetry. Although the images are abstract, I am finding that many of them are shapes and compositions that can be interpreted as illustrations. I’m finding it interesting to choose the images that go on each page and I wonder if people will see similar things to what I see. I expect the the juxtaposition with the text will help to inform the viewer’s mind what they are “supposed” to be seeing. At any rate, it is an interesting experiment if nothing else. I expect I will test it on some poor unsuspecting people before publication and determine if it works well enough to spend the money on printing. Time will tell.

    And here are today’s obligatory photos:

    PhilO

    April 12, 2014
    Artwork, Misc, School, Thoughts
  • EN•TRANCE – Project Space with Emma Drye

    This past Monday Emma and I had our Project Space in C02, which we entitled “En•trance”. Coincidentally, Emma was also offered a opportunity to teach in Barnsley this week, so in order to allow her to accept it, we shuffled things about a bit, schedule wise.

    The concept we came up with in one of our early chats on this project was “doors or portals”. We decided that we would not collaborate on a single piece but would rather each respond to the theme in our own way. We both work strongly with narrative and we hoped that this would tie the whole show together. There was always the risk that we would each create something that had no reason to be in the same room as the other’s piece, but we kept abreast of each others progress and in the end it all seems to have worked out.

    My concept went through several phases before I came up with a final plan. I had been wanting to do something that hearkened back to my Norwegian heritage ever since I visited Oslo this past summer. I considered painting or drawing on door panels, telling a tale from Norse Myth, but decided to save that for another time. I began thinking of things I had seen while in Norway and it suddenly came to me.

    Scandinavian countries like Norway have a tradition of building stave churches. These early church structures were made entirely of wood and constructed in the same manner that they use in boat building. They began to fall out of favour in the Middle Ages and came to be considered obsolete in some countries  as newer construction methods became popular.

    When I was in Oslo, at the Museum of Cultural History, they have several portals from vanished stave churches. I got to thinking about them and how their removal had completely changed their meaning.

    The portals of a stave church are weighted with symbolism. They represent the threshold, the barrier between the real world and the spiritual world. These doorways are introductions to the space within and the carvings on the door posts speak in a language that was culturally understood. They prepared the faithful for their transformation from secular to sacred and helped to impart the message of the church.

    By removing these portals from their churches and placing them against a white wall in a museum, the symbolism changes dramatically. The functionality of the portal is completely negated since you can no longer pass through it. Their purpose as sacred art is also altered, becoming simply secular objects of art. The love, devotion and care that went into their creation is still apparent, but the reason for it becomes obscured.

    Many of these doors took imagery from Norse myth, perhaps to promote an association between the Christian faith and the old gods, during a period of transition. A popular theme is the tree of life, something the Norse might easily interpret as Yggdrasil, the world tree.

    So I decided that I wanted to construct a stave church portal, but also to highlight these conflicts that I saw with their transformation from sacred to secular art. I decided that I would create a tree of life design based on Yggdrasil as the foundation of my portal. I decided to use the CNC Milling Machine, a computer controlled router, to do the carving for me, so I chose to simplify my design since I was not certain of the limits of the machine. Both for monetary and for aesthetic reasons I decided to use blue foam, a form of polystyrene insulation, as the material to be milled.

    The first step was to create the design, which I did by hand in pen and ink. This was then scanned into Photoshop, preparatory to taking it into the 3d software. Since I am not that familiar with using 3d software, I chose to use a method that works fine for relief items but not for in the round sculpture, converting a greyscale image to a heightfield.

    Simply, the process is thus: in Photoshop or similar software, you create your image, keeping in mind that it will be converted to 3d based on the values of grey in the image. White will be the highest point and black the lowest. If your piece of polystyrene is 50mm thick, like mine, then a 50% grey will be 25mm deep; 10% grey is 5mm, a 30% grey is 15mm and so on.

    Once the greyscale image was complete, I cut it up into portions based on the size the CNC router could handle, each one approximately 1100mm x 350mm. These I saved as TIF files which I loaded into Rhinoceros, the 3D software I was using, and used the Heightfield from Image command. After some trial and error and minor manipulation, I had the STL files I needed to input into the CNC controller.

    I considered painting the surface to resemble wood, but opted to go with the bare polystyrene in order to emphasise the distance from the original portals. After assembling the pieces together and reinforcing the seams, I constructed a wooden prop to allow it to safely stand up. This would allow me to place the portal into the room rather than up against a wall, allowing people to travel through and around it, seeing both the facade and the reality of the backside.

    All the construction was done in C02, prior to our show opening on Monday. I spent most of Thursday assembling it and on Saturday, Emma and I spent some time deciding on the best location to stand it, so it would create a nice counterpoint to both her door and the main door to the room.

    So, with both pieces installed, we had the opening on Monday, which was fairly well attended, and then the critique in the afternoon. Unfortunately, I have been getting over a cold and was not feeling up to par, so I have difficulty recalling exactly what was said during the crit. From my notes, it seems that most people got the idea that it was a portal into a fantasy realm, but that the material and support structure in back detracted from that, so that rather than passing through and being uplifted, they were let down. This is not far off from what I intended, so I’m calling that a positive comment. Though I did not expect the connection to be made with Norwegian stave churches, I was hoping that I would have the opportunity to explain it.

    Unfortunately, we were trying a new crit format this week. Normally, the group makes comments one after another, and the artist says nothing until the end, when they can comment on their own work. This time the format was changed to one where each person in the group made their comment and then asked a question. The artist then responds only to the question asked and the next person comments and questions, etc. At the end, it was simply over without the artist being able to comment upon their work.

    I feel that this format didn’t work well for me, for two reasons. First was the fact that I was not able to explain the origins of my work, which I think might have clarified some of the decisions I made; and second, I felt like I was not getting a “pure” response from the people further in the group. By hearing the questions and answers earlier, they had the opportunity to change their view of the work based on what was said. It seemed to make the latter comments a little less like gut reactions and more homogenised.

    If I had this piece to do again, I think there is very little I would change. Now that I know more about the CNC router, I might approach that differently, maybe making the design more complex and cleaning it up a bit more. I  might try to make the design more Norse and less Celtic looking, but the roots of the imagery are similar and their art was severely cross-pollenated, so that could be a losing battle. Overall I think I would create the same basic piece.

    PhilO

    November 15, 2013
    Artwork, Critique, Exhibitions, Misc, School
  • A New Year Begun

    Last week was the start of the third semester of the MFA programme here at ECA. We had inductions which outlined our lecture and seminar programmes, met with out tutors and started settling into our studios. Our studios have been switched around this year and I have moved from C19 to C09 on the other side of the building, nearly catty-corner to where I was before.

    C08 is a much smaller area, but the studio spaces seem larger. I will be sharing the room with Tam, Jess, Morgan, and two first years, Steph and Stephen. Perhaps by plan, we all seem to work with 3D materials.

    My crit group remains much the same, myself, Jess, and Morgan, with the addition of two first years, Steph and Joanna.

    Our studio emphasis this year is called “Sites” and part of the focus will be on

    emerging sites of distibution and consumption, … different articulations of space and place in the field of contemporary art, … tactics and strategies for artistic dissemination … [and] to work with both your peers and external participants in the professional presentation and validation of your practice

    Our lectures this year will be on Visual Cultures in general, and from that we had three choices from which I chose Material Cultures, an examination of the anthropological and social aspects of objects which proposes  “that objects, like people, lead ‘social lives’.”

    In addition, we have an assortment of readings, papers, presentations, artwork and such to produce.

    Again, we have to curate the Project Space, C02, a roughly 12′ x 12′ two-storey tall white room, in pairs. I will be working with Emma this year and our Project Space will be in November. We meet to discuss it next week, so hopefully we will get our ducks in a row early on.

    We also have a trip to the Venice Biennale set for the end of October, and a trip to London for the opening of the Fleming Collection exhibition on October 15.

    Tomorrow we meet one  on one with our tutors, mine being Kenny Hunter to discuss our plans and get things off on the right foot.

    I think I’m going to be busy…

    PhilO

    September 22, 2013
    Misc, School, Thoughts
  • Website and Portfolio Updated

    What’s up:

    At one point last year, I set myself the goal of updating my website and having it ready by the end of the summer. I am happy to say that I have met that goal and am ready to unveil my full website.

    Of course this doesn’t mean that nothing further will be changed or added on, but the bulk of the construction work has (hopefully) been done. This blog, which you might have noticed gradually changing its colours over the past couple months, will remain in place with no major alterations.

    What’s New:

    I have added an improved portfolio section where you can view my work, segregated by medium.

    Under the About menu, you will find my Bio, which is similar to that in the sidebar to the right, but may be expanded and updated down the line.

    It also includes the Exhibitions link, leading to an events calendar which will be continually updated with information on where I am next displaying my work.

    The About menu will  also (in the future) contain links to my C.V. and Artist’s Statement, and there’s room for further expansion if I think of other items I need to add.

    What I’ve done:

    This section might get a little boring for non-technical folks, so if you stop reading now I won’t be offended.

    Originally, I was hoping to create my entire site using WordPress, the program that powers my blog, so my first quest was to seek out portfolio plug-ins for WordPress and to see if I could find some nice examples of artists’ websites built entirely using WordPress. I found some, but they all seemed heavily modified or extremely simplistic. I was looking for one that I could update easily, that would read the exif data from my images and produce titles, tags and such using that information, one that would give me a choice of layouts, and that I would not end up having to modify to hell and gone or need to be a programmer to alter. And it also had to be free. This last qualifier was not difficult to fulfil since there are so many open source projects out there. The problem was finding one which was consistently being updated and which could meet my other needs.

    I didn’t find one.

    My next step was to consider a Content Management System (CMS). I have used these before on a small scale and they can work well when you have a varied site like this (portfolio, blog, calendar, and future expansion possibilities). Unfortunately, the ones I had used before were stalled in development and I wanted something I could use going forward. So I examined a number of CMS’s to no avail. For the past decade I have not done much coding and learning how to customise a new CMS seems to require it these days. I might consider switching down the line, but I really didn’t see any that really grabbed me. I think the problem is that most of them are catering to businesses rather than artists, so their target audience is more interested in management and less in content.

    I then considered using a portfolio system developed with artists in mind. The main drawback I came across with all the systems I examined was that most of them did not support multiple uploads. When you are setting up a portfolio of more than 10 images, you do not want to be stuck uploading each one individually. Many of them were simply photo galleries, without any real intuitive interface or add ons.

    I was already using ZenPhoto for the Gammon Collection, and though it worked well for that, I did’t feel it would work well for my art portfolio. I tried other photo galleries and again decided they were not feature rich enough. I tried  Stacey and Secretary and any number of CMS’s which were ‘designed for artists.’ None of them fit my needs.

    Finally, I stumbled on a project called Koken. It is a fairly new project but shows a lot of promise. The developers have written their own markup language which makes creating templates a breeze. If you can code in HTML and CSS then you can customise Koken. If you even need to; the built in themes are all very attractive and usable right out of the box.

    It includes a blogging tool as well as portfolios and the back end administration area looks like it was pulled out of a high-end software program. You can upload images directly from Adobe Lightroom with no trouble. Titles, captions, tags and so forth are all pulled from exif data. It is a beautiful, well constructed program that met nearly every one of my criteria. And it is free.

    Once I started playing around with Koken, I was hooked. I loved the interface, I loved the themes and I loved the ease of usability. Soon, I was building my own theme, taking bits and pieces from their other themes to create my own. The only drawback I came across was the menu functionality. At the time I wanted to go live, I could only use it to build menus which lived internally to Koken and there was no way to easily integrate it with WordPress.

    My solution was to build the banner across the top of the page manually, creating a fixed title and CSS dropdown menu which I could include in both Koken and WordPress. Unfortunately, this means that if I want to update it, I need to do so in two separate places. Not the ideal solution, but still doable.

    Koken is still in its infancy, currently in beta version 0.9 but there is soon to be another update. I really hope that Koken becomes the CMS of my dreams and that I can build my entire website with it, quickly and easily, without losing all the functionality that WordPress provides. One day soon perhaps, but not today.

    If you are an artist looking to display your paintings, sculptures, drawings, photography or whatever else on the web, I cannot recommend Koken highly enough. I consider it the pinnacle of portfolio programs and the ideal CMS for an artist just starting their web presence. If you’ve been keeping a blog already, you might hesitate to switch, but I still recommend you give it a try. I anticipate big things in the future of Koken.

    PhilO

    September 10, 2013
    Misc, Thoughts
  • Oslo Trip, Part II: Munch, Norwegian Art & Pipervika

    Day two of my Oslo adventure was, unfortunately, a short day since I flew out in the evening. I needed to head to the airport by 4pm, so I had planned only on visiting the National Gallery of Art today, leaving the afternoon open for whatever. On my (roundabout) way there, at the intersection of St. Olaf’s Gate and Kristian IV’s Gate, I discovered a wonderful memorial to the composer Rikard Nordraak who composed the Norwegian National Anthem. It is hidden in a little copse of trees with stairs leading up to it. At the base of the stairs is a pair of wrought iron creatures which strongly resemble traditional Viking dragons, and at the top of the stairs is a block of stone with a statue of Nordraak. This piece was created by Gustav Vigeland around 1911.

    I arrived at the Gallery early and got my ticket to Munch 150, a retrospective of Edvard Munch‘s work, celebrating his 150 birthday.  Like most museums in the UK, The National Gallery in Oslo is free if you’re visiting the standard collections but is ticketed for special exhibitions.

    Unfortunately, the Gallery did not allow photographs in the Munch exhibition, so I have no photos of his work. If you are only familiar with The Scream, I suggest checking out examples of his other work on the Google Art Project, or on Wikipedia.

    Since they curated the exhibition in both a thematic and a chronological order, I found it very interesting to watch Munch’s transition from a Realist portrait painter to that of the Symbolist who painted the Scream, with several stylistic variations in between. Looking at paintings during the period 1893 and 1900 I could see a variety of styles and influences, before he arrived at the intensely coloured, flowing style he is most associated with. With his paintings, Munch began exploring peak emotional states, and began working on a series he later called “The Frieze of Life.” This series includes works such as Madonna, Anxiety, The Kiss, Vampire, Death in the Sick Room, and, of course, The Scream.

    Munch worked in a number of media, experimenting with lithography, woodcuts and oil pastels among others. The exhibition shows how he would recreate the same motif in multiple media, or by developing printmaking techniques to change the image’s colour or background.

    He died in 1944 during the Nazi occupation of Norway, bequeathing his artistic estate to the city of Oslo. This became the basis for the Munch Museum which opened in 1963.

    After the Munch exhibit, I wandered through the other exhibits. The Gallery had a modest gallery of European artists on display including Picasso, Monet, Rodin, Degas, and Gauguin. They were also running an exhibition in conjunction with Munch 150, called Highlights from the Collection. This featured Norwegian artists such as J.C. Dahl, Adolph Tidemand, Christian Krohg, and Harald Sohlberg. They were primarily realist, romantic painters whose work often had a nationalistic focus. This exhibition was an interesting contrast to Munch, whose focus was the psyche, rendered in symbolic style.

    When I finished at the Gallery, I still had a couple of hours to kill before heading to the airport. I decided to take a walk and explore Pipervika, the district around the waterfront. On my way, I passed through Eidsvolls plass, a park with the National Theatre at one end and the Norwegian Parliament building at the other. Bordered on one side by Karl Johans Gate, a pedestrian shopping street, the park is dotted with statues and trees, a fountain and an ice rink in the winter. It is a beautiful little oasis in the downtown area of Oslo.

    I made my way down to the Oslo City Hall, a huge brick building built in the early twentieth century. It faces the harbour and is surrounded with statues, a fountain in front, and a clock in one of the towers. A second astronomical clock is also situated on the north side.

    From here, I headed west and passed the Nobel Peace Center, then headed out toward Aker Brygge, a district situated on an arm of land that juts out into Oslo Fjord. I walked along the water and discovered several public art pieces– statues of both traditional and modern styles. At the end of Aker Brygge is the Astrup Fearnley Museum of Modern Art, a privately funded contemporary art gallery. I had planned on visiting here, but looking at the time I realised that I needed to start heading to the airport.

    I turned around and walked back to the National Theatre train station and caught the train to Torp-Sandefjord where I was flying out of. The train was crowded and I feared that I would have to stand the entire trip, but after a few stops, enough commuters got off to allow most of us to sit. I soon arrived at the airport, checked in and flew out.

     

    PhilO

    August 27, 2013
    Misc, Research, Thoughts, Travel
  • Oslo Trip, Part I: VIkings, Culture, Art & History

    This past week, I took another quickie trip, this time to Oslo, Norway. The choice of destination may sound a little odd to some people, so let me briefly explain. I have been doing genealogical research this summer since I have been, for a long time, interested in my ancestral roots. I find it interesting to think of how our ancestry influences the people we are and what those roots can tell us.

    My father was adopted, so we know virtually nothing about his (biological) side of the family. I think this may have influenced my quest for identity more than any other factor. On my mother’s side, I have been able to trace the the family back several generations, and it appears that my great-grandmother (along with her parents and a passel of siblings) immigrated from Norway to the United States in the late nineteenth century. I have yet to trace them into Norway itself, but still hope to do so.

    I am considering working some of this heritage into my art, possibly through folk tales or mythic imagery, so I decided it would be a good opportunity to do a little hands on research. I arrived in Norway at the Torp-Sandefjord Airport, south of Oslo, on Wednesday evening. My plane was late and it was dark out, so I was unable to much of the landscape. I boarded the shuttle to the train and took the train to Oslo. It was a short walk from the train station to my hotel.

    On Thursday morning, I rose early and had breakfast in the hotel. They had a buffet which was geared to a more continental palette, reminding me of what was considered breakfast when I stayed in Germany many years ago. The hotel had made some concessions to their US and UK visitors by providing scrambled eggs, baked beans and cereal. The rest of the buffet consisted of breads, runny yogurt, processed meat, fresh veggies, cheese,  tomato and onion salad and other items I was unable to identify. It was interesting and fun to have such diverse options.

    My first stop was the Viking Ship Museum which is located with a cluster of other cultural museums on a small spurt of land called Bygdøy. Bygdøy juts out into Oslo Fjord and is bit west of downtown Oslo. The bus took me right to the doorstep of the museum and in I walked. It was amazing to see the ships here in their various states of reconstruction.There are three ships here, perhaps the most famous of which is the Osberg ship, discovered in 1903 by a farmer on Lille Oseberg farm in Slagen in Vestfold.

    In the year 834, two prosperous women died. The Oseberg ship was pulled ashore and used as a burial ship for the two ladies. A burial chamber was dug right behind the ship’s mast. Inside, the walls were decorated with fantastic woven tapestries and the dead women lay on a raised bed. The women had a number of burial gifts with them. There were personal items such as clothes, shoes and combs, ship’s equipment, kitchen equipment, farm equipment, three ornate sledges and a working sledge, a wagon, five carved animal heads, five beds and two tents. There were fifteen horses, six dogs and two small cows.

    The Gokstad ship was uncovered in 1879.

    The Gokstad ship was built in about 850, at the height of the Viking period. There was a need for ships that could serve many purposes and the Gokstad ship could have been used for voyages of exploration, trade and Viking raids. The ship could be both sailed and rowed. There are 16 oar holes on each side of the ship. With oarsmen, steersman and lookout, that would have meant a crew of 34. There is no sign of thwarts. The oarsmen probably sat on chests, which could also have held personal equipment.

    The ship is made of oak and is clinker-built, with 16 rows of strakes. The nine strakes below the waterline are only two to three centimetres thick, making the sides both light and flexible. The keel is made of one straight piece of oak. The deck consists of pine planks that can be easily lifted, so that the crew could easily bale out water if needed. This also gave storage space for a little cargo.

    White woollen cloth with red cloth strips sewn on was found in the forepart of the ship. This may have been the remains of the sail. At the time of burial, 32 shields were fixed to each side of the ship. They were painted yellow and black, alternately. The ends of the bow and stern posts had rotted away, so it is unclear how they were finished. There is nothing to indicate that dragon heads were fixed to them. But even without dragon heads, the Gokstad ship must have been an impressive sight when it came over the horizon in full sail.

    The third ship is from Tune, excavated in 1867 on Nedre Haugen farm at Rolvsøy, near Fredrikstad. Since this was an early excavation, standard archeological practices were not yet in place and the find was not removed or preserved with the care that the others received. Not only are there spade marks on parts of the ship from the careless way that it was uncovered, but many of the items of the find itself went missing and never made it back to Oslo.

    Not only are the ships fascinating, but the artefacts recovered are remarkable as well. I was immensely impressed with the intricate and complex carvings on both the ships and on the other artefacts from the sites. The cart, sleighs, post heads and tent posts are all carved with these distinctive designs. Many are decorated with silver or bronze tack heads which set off and accent the designs. According to the archeologist’s notes, when these artefacts were uncovered the designs were painted with bright colours. “To conserve the fragile wood, many of the objects were immersed in a solution of hot alum salts. Afterwards the pieces were glued and screwed together, and then varnished for display.” Unfortunately, the alum salts removed any surface paint and sometimes caused fine details to disappear.

    Just down the road from the Ship Museum is the Norwegian Folk Museum, “Norway’s largest museum of cultural history featuring the world’s oldest open air museum and large indoor collections.” This is similar in some ways to the Alaska Native Heritage Center, where there are houses of the various Alaskan Native peoples and traditionally dressed attendants who answer questions and provide information.

    In this case, the houses and outbuildings are from various parts of Norway from around 1500 to the present. They have rebuilt complete farms, logging sites, an apartment building and numerous other dwellings. There are over 150 buildings from rural and urban Norway, including the collection of King Oscar II (yes, he collected buildings). The buildings are decorated appropriately for their status and eras; some quite ornately while others are very simple with perhaps some carved areas on the wooden walls or doors. In addition to classic log structures and traditional looking farmhouses, there is a magnificent Stave Church from Gol. In 1880 it was to be replaced with a more modern building, so it was presented to King Oscar who had it transported and rebuilt on Bygdøy.

    There is also an “Old Town” section which is comprised of buildings from Oslo and its suburbs.

    Christiania (Oslo)
    In 1624 the town of Oslo was completely destroyed by fire. King Christian IV decreed that the town should be moved west, closer to the protection of Akershus Fortress. This new town was called Christiania and was laid out with wide streets which met at right angles, designed to hinder the spread of fire. Buildings in the new town were to be made of stone or brick, and not of the traditional log construction. People who could not afford to build brick houses were allowed to build half-timbered structures, “in the Danish fashion.” Christiania became a little town typical of Northern Europe with 330 properties with buildings of brick, half­timbering and logs. Ramparts were built around the town for defense. These defined the town’s dimensions for many years to come. The wealthy lived around Bjørvika, the harbor area. The harbor was continually being filled in and new streets and houses built.

    Many of these small, old-world buildings were replaced during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and some were acquired and rebuilt at the Folk Museum to form the Old Town. Like the other buildings in the Folk Museum, you can look inside many of these and see furnishings and decorations from their appropriate eras.

    After wandering around the nearly 35 square acre site for a few hours, I was ready for some time indoors, so I hopped the bus back to Oslo proper and headed to the Museum of Cultural History. Here, the more fragile bits of the ship burials residing at the Viking Ship Museum are displayed, in addition other artefacts from the Stone, Bronze, Iron and Viking Ages in Norway, a Mediaeval Gallery and Ethnographic and Egyptian exhibitions.

    It was getting to be late in the day and I had only an hour or so before the museum closed, so I concentrated on the Viking Age and Museum galleries. The Viking Age collection contains jewellery, weapons, tools, and such, all uniquely decorated and carved. It was amazing to see these items in person, having so often seen them before in books and drawings. Brooches and pins were all intricately decorated with carvings that baffle the eye. The simplicity of the forms combines with the complex knotwork patterns to form a maze that one can get lost in.

    In the Mediaeval Gallery, they had collected some fine examples of the carved entryways to Stave Churches. Stave Churches are of wooden, post and lintel construction; the load-bearing posts are called stav in Norwegian. The portals were often decorated with traditional knotwork designs incorporating animals, birds and people into the intricate patterns.

    As I exited the Mediaeval Gallery, I realised that they the museum was closing and it was time to go.

    PhilO

    August 26, 2013
    Misc, Research, Thoughts, Travel
1 2 3 … 6
Next Page
  • Contact Me
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Etsy

© 2024 Philip R. Obermarck